#Corona tracker india code#
But critics have expressed concern because it is not open source, despite an Indian government mandate that its apps make their code available to the public. Kumar stresses that the app was built to the standards of a draft data privacy bill that is currently in the country’s parliament, and says access to the data it collects is strictly controlled. The list of developers, largely made up of private-sector volunteers, is not entirely public. There are no strong, transparent policy or design limitations on accessing or using the data at this point. India has no national data privacy law, and it’s not clear who has access to data from the app and in what situations. It’s whitelisted by all Indian telecom companies, so using it does not count against mobile data limits. And on top of this, Aarogya Setu (which means “a bridge to health” in Hindi) also offers access to telemedicine, an e-pharmacy, and diagnostic services.
#Corona tracker india Bluetooth#
It tracks Bluetooth contact events and location-as many other apps do-but also gives each user a color-coded badge showing infection risk. India’s app, though, is a massive all-in-one undertaking that far exceeds what most other countries are building. Many countries are developing limited services that use Bluetooth or GPS to give “exposure notifications” to people who have interacted with someone found to have covid-19. MIT Technology Review’s database shows that India’s app is unique in a number of other ways, too.
“There is a risk of initiating a tool that can be repurposed for surveillance after the pandemic.” A massive all-in-one undertaking
“There is an infringement on human rights that is not justified here,” says Estelle Massé, a senior policy analyst at the digital rights group Access Now. “But fear must not be leveraged to track citizens without their consent.” “Technology can help keep us safe,” Gandhi recently tweeted. Rahul Gandhi, a prominent member of the Indian parliament and former leader of the opposition Indian National Congress, is among those who have criticized the app, charging that it has “no institutional oversight” and raises “serious data security and privacy concerns.”
0 kommentar(er)
